3 ms·
Yeah a single employee's testimony against an aircraft, the 787, that has safely flying every day since then, does not have that effect. Especially when all of
by carabiner 3y ago
Yeah a single employee's testimony against an aircraft, the 787, that has safely flying every day since then, does not have that effect. Especially when all of that Barnett testified on years ago.
Boeing does not make $7B from the 787.
If you want to take someone out, make it a 737 MAX whistleblower.
- 317070 3y agoThey didn't know who was going to be the 737 MAX whistleblower. The whistleblower might not have known himself. But the 737 MAX whistleblower was also taken out yesterday.
- littlestymaar 3y agoHow could Boeing make sure to limit the amount of whistleblowers on the 737 MAX case? Killing former whistleblowers is a great way to send a message to everyone considering the option right now.