Yeah... I'm not super surprised by this really. Initially it looked fine, but the more I looked at the design and way the site worked, the more I realized it wa

Yeah... I'm not super surprised by this really. Initially it looked fine, but the more I looked at the design and way the site worked, the more I realized it was really questionable in quality. For example: - "Infographics are 30 to 40 times more likely to be viewed and shared vs. text." - an un-cited statistic they put upfront. almost ironic - Left and right arrows don't do anything, they just hash the url - Their feedback url isn't an actual place for feedback, it's a survey - Click login - the back end is wordpress (?!) - If you view the source, you can quickly see that this was made with a pre-assembled wordpress theme (http://test.nattywp.com/preview.php?theme=ifolio http://test.nattywp.com/preview.php?theme=ifolio) - The rest of the source is an absolute mess with inline styles and scripts ... if this is the amount of effort put into the landing page, it's hard to trust the rest of it...