5 ms·
s/Lab-Grown// would be a better idea. - Climate change - Antibiotic resistance - Novel pandemic pathogen evolution, including the "Spanish" flu and COVID-19
by anon-sre-srm 3y ago
s/Lab-Grown// would be a better idea.
- Climate change
- Antibiotic resistance
- Novel pandemic pathogen evolution, including the "Spanish" flu and COVID-19
- Air pollution
- Water pollution
- Soil pollution
- Reduced total available calories
- Increased food prices
- Deforestation
... way, way down here is animal cruelty because the actions of 99% of people prove they don't give 2 fucks so long as they don't see it or the animals aren't cute.
- swatcoder 3y agoReducing overall meat consumption would be great in a lot of ways, but lab-grown meats are a luxury product for the next few decades and will basically fall off the map if there's any kind of extreme or prolonged global crisis, which will happen sooner or later. I spent years being vegan and vegetarian and still eat many meals that way, but the idea of purging ranching and meat consumption from the world is technologist hubris and the start to someone's dystopian novel. I mean, maybe it'll happen responsibly some day, but if you're grounded in reality and history, it's a 500 year transition, not a 5 year one.
- xeonmc 3y agoReminds me of "The Food of the Gods" by Arthur C. Clarke: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38303638 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38303638
- samus 3y agoThen there's no reason to ban it. If anything, real meat might surprisingly soon be the expensive luxury food. We humans are pretty good at figuring out ways to scale up complex production processes and drive costs down.
- jesterson 3y agoI would ask how "climate change" or "water pollution" has anything to do with proper meat, but there is no substantiated answer expected. You may "reduce total available calories" yourself, that's fine, but other people should have a choice in a free country. That's why I would never touch lab "meat" with a telegraph pole, but against banning it per se.
- exe34 3y agoAlso, the flesh eaters get very emotional, just as much as the pro-"life" supporters. Cruelty is irrelevant to them.
- funcDropShadow 3y agoAnd the vegan climate activists that prefer to wear plastic shoes from mineral oil instead of responsibly produced leather shoes are not getting emotional?
- SideburnsOfDoom 3y agoOf course. "personal freedom" is a multi-edged implement, it's not just for meat-eaters. There is no "pro freedom" argument in preventing me from choosing "lab-grown meat", if I want to. My reasons might be good or bad, emotional or not, that's irrelevant. You can't prevent me and also claim to be all for personal freedom, as these states like to.
- kelipso 3y agoThe freedom to not be exposed to lab-grown meat. To live a life free of experimental, potentially harmful, not widely tested lab-grown meat is important for a happy and healthy life. Etc.
- itishappy 3y agoThat's not freedom. Are we also given the freedom to choose lab-grown meat if we so please? Otherwise "freedom to choose the only available option" is disingenuous. Also understand that the FDA regulates lab-grown meat to the same health standards as farm-grown meat, and you can go buy genetically modified meat in the store today. 95% of meat sold in the US is thus "experimental." https://www.fda.gov/food/human-food-made-cultured-animal-cells/formal-agreement-between-fda-and-usda-regarding-oversight-human-food-produced-using-animal-cell https://www.fda.gov/food/human-food-made-cultured-animal-cel... https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/gmo-crops-and-food-animals https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/gmo-crop...
- 3y ago
- anlum 3y agoIf you think lab-grown meat is anything other than a massive accelerrant to the problem of antibiotic resistance, you've got another thing coming. A bioreactor is basically just an animal with a severely curtailed feature set - limited homeostasis, no sense organs, cognition, locomotion, etc. Crucially, a bioreactor has no immune system. It's a soup of muscle cells with basically no defense against external pathogens. Sterile technique will only get you so far, especially at scale. Lab-grown meat pretty much constitutionally requires constant antibiotic input. It's the price you pay for stripping the concept of animal as meat machine down to its most basic essence.
- okokwhatever 3y agoYour answer is SO well informed and focused out of the hype that I just can say thanks.
- bmer 3y agoExcept it's also very wrong. So, it just happened to make you feel good, and therefore it felt well-informed?
- JR1427 3y agoI also find it interesting that people don't seem to think too hard about where lab grown meat is heading. You could imagine that the culture mechanisms will get more and more sophisticated, building up some of the systems seen in animals from scratch. I have (partly jokingly) thought about the idea that rather than redesign animals from the ground up, why not just engineer out the qualities that we (think) we don't want in livestock animals. It wouldn't be hard to selectively breed brain-dead carcasses that require life-support machines to grow. And then we can harvest the meat from brain-dead animals. Yum. Sounds appealing, doesn't it?...
- dartos 3y agoI think it’s more likely that we just grow cells into basically a large living meatball. Why go through the effort to grow skin, eyes, and bones when all we want is a wad of meat