3 ms·
> we could use openly licensed images There simply aren't enough of them. Stable Diffusion is trained on 5 billion images. That kind of scale doesn't exist in
by dheera 3y ago
> we could use openly licensed images
There simply aren't enough of them. Stable Diffusion is trained on 5 billion images. That kind of scale doesn't exist in public domain artwork. This dataset of 88k images is 0.0017% of that.
Also, it's worth noting that intellectual property is a weird construct. Human artists are trained from looking at copyrighted works their entire lifetime. If you asked me to draw a cartoonistic bear I cannot guarantee you that it doesn't vaguely look like Winnie the Pooh or Baloo. I've seen those things and can't un-erase them from my head. And if you prevented me from ever seeing copyrighted works for my whole life, I might not be able to draw anything.
So why are we holding AI to a different standard?
- TaylorAlexander 3y ago> Stable Diffusion is trained on 5 billion images. That kind of scale doesn't exist in public domain artwork. Right, which is why work on sample-efficiency would be so valuable. > So why are we holding AI to a different standard? Because it is an automated computer system, not a human being. It can be held to a different standard because it is an entirely different system.
- ufocia 3y agoI don't think we are on the training side. I think the artists would like us to.