3 ms·
Please don't do this. He's repeatedly denied it, and your ignorant claim can only bring him and his family trouble. (Also, I've known Adam for a number of yea
by RustyRussell 3y ago
Please don't do this.
He's repeatedly denied it, and your ignorant claim can only bring him and his family trouble.
(Also, I've known Adam for a number of years and I can personally vouch that it's not him!)
- mightyham 3y agoI can and will continue to say that he is probably Satoshi because there is a large amount of evidence for that being the case. In the past, Adam elaborated reasons why he thinks it's good for bitcoin that Satoshi be anonymous and he has a large vested interest in the success of bitcoin (his business), so his public (and according to you private) denial is really not good evidence one way or the other.