I haven't read this case but much of the time that courts are deciding weird looking statements like "this person didn't cheat at this video game" or "Craig Wri

I haven't read this case but much of the time that courts are deciding weird looking statements like "this person didn't cheat at this video game" or "Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto" it's in defamation cases. I say "coding123 is a big poopy head" so you sue me saying that I defamed you. In most countries truth is a defence for defamation, so if I can prove that you are in fact a big poopy head then I can defend myself from the suit. That means that a court has to determine the truth of a statement that doesn't seem like a thing that courts should be worrying about