3 ms·
I think it's always going to be the case that we'll get to AGI through a collection of neural networks and symbolic logic systems and not through just a single
by empath-nirvana 3y ago
I think it's always going to be the case that we'll get to AGI through a collection of neural networks and symbolic logic systems and not through just a single neural network. For some reason a lot of people think that's "cheating", though.
- bevekspldnw 3y agoIf this thing can clean my kitchen I’ll let it cheat all day.
- trashtester 3y agoThe way I see it, a symbolic logic system is not an integral part to an AGI, but rather a tool that it can use the same way humans use tools. Tools can be useful for many things, but tend to be inflexible compared to neural nets. The way I see it, the main benefit of such tools come when the part covered by the tool is very repetitive and well defined. In such cases, algorithmic solutions may offer better precision and lower power consumption than neural nets. Anyway, once most of these algorithms are actually WRITTEN by AGI's, the difference may cease to matter.