4 ms·
Just observing trends I see around messaging, reddit conversations, twitter and policy...this appears to be by design. I can't begin to imagine the games that
by brightball 3y ago
Just observing trends I see around messaging, reddit conversations, twitter and policy...this appears to be by design.
I can't begin to imagine the games that billionaires and other various cabals play in influencing policy over the years, but from my own observation it seems to be intentional.
EDIT: Since this is generating some conversation, I'll add more detail. The article is actually quite good at explaining a lot of the details.
My own observations over the last 20 years, I've seen what appears to be consorted interest in breaking up institutions that bring communities together.
Public schools are a big one as there are enough differences of opinion on policy, rules, funding approaches, discipline, levels of control from the school itself, to parents, to school boards, to state governments, to the department of education. Public schools used to be a point of pride for communities and currently they are a point of conflict.
Churches are another where people in a community would actively come together to learn to be better people, serve their community and serve each other with a higher cause. They also created wonderful environments for youth activities outside of school. Attacks on church communities have been fairly relentless online doing as much as possible to influence people away from them. Legislatures even got in on the action during Covid too.[3]
The concussion scare amplification around football in particular in the US did a ton of damage to the sport, despite women's soccer actually being the most dangerous sport for concussions.[1] This had an outsized effect on participation in youth football, which does more to positively influence young men and communities in general than any other sport in the US due to the diversity of participants, body types, different position jobs, roles and the need for everyone to work together as a unit to find success. Some advocates is even trying to ban it outright in California, but the governor shot it down.[2] High school football coaches are also put in great positions to act as both coaches, counselors and father figures for many young men who do not have them. The roster sizes of football teams go a long way towards making this one of the US's greatest community institutions.
This continues at the college level until recently and we just saw the greatest coach in the history of the sport, Nick Saban, retire and speak at the capital about why. He used to be able to help prepare young men for success in life. Now all anybody cares about is money.
There's more of course, but it's a seemingly intentional trend where the pattern that I see is institutions that bring communities together being attacked or turned into something divisive.
1- https://theconversation.com/do-women-soccer-players-have-more-concussions-this-world-cup-and-beyond-heres-how-to-keep-our-players-safe-208292 https://theconversation.com/do-women-soccer-players-have-mor...
2 - https://apnews.com/article/california-youth-tackle-football-ban-1a375b9d3c332e9ad42603c2871623d6 https://apnews.com/article/california-youth-tackle-football-...
3 - https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/supreme-court-blocks-ny-enforcing-covid-limits-churches-n1249079 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/supreme-court-blocks-ny...
- kube-system 3y agoAre you suggesting that there is some conspiracy that the billionaire class is undertaking to do this intentionally? I think the answer is much more simple. Social media creators and platforms thrive off of engagement, and narratives that prey on people’s insecurities are highly effective at keeping people engaged and glued to their phones rather than having productive social lives.
- horrysith 3y ago[flagged]
- wenebego 3y agoIt doesnt need to be a conspiracy, it is a group of very powerful people, with similar interests based on their class. A class who happens to need another class to continue working/making babies to ensure their way of life doesnt collapse.
- kube-system 3y agoThat sounds like a great plot line for a story, but why is the more simple answer wrong? Moreover, why would anyone actively and maliciously need to espouse those viewpoints when there are perfectly explainable reasons for those viewpoints to circulate naturally? I know there are many influencers are associated with certain powerful and funded groups, but the majority of people parroting these viewpoints are not related.
- wenebego 3y agoI never said the more simple answer is wrong, im explaining why it doesnt need to be a conspiracy. You are also assuming "actively and maliciously," thats not necesarily the case. Of course the best lie has a grain of truth. The majority of people need to get their words to parrot from somewhere. This is where the powerful and funded groups come in, money gives your message more reach.
- sprash 3y ago