3 ms·
Disk space is so expensive today, they couldn't possibly afford to keep more than 30 days. Also, their video cameras probably shoot in 8K 10bit RAW uncompresse
by dist-epoch 3y ago
Disk space is so expensive today, they couldn't possibly afford to keep more than 30 days.
Also, their video cameras probably shoot in 8K 10bit RAW uncompressed.
- ies7 3y agoFor video (especially with proper 3-2-1 backup) it is somehow expensive. 5 years of our sales and finance data from 10+ countries takes less than a petabyte Our 2 years backup of hundreds CCTV for only a single factory compressed, reduced to 15 fps takes around 4 PB. This data only used when we have a complaint case. Most of the times it just overwritten with new data without a single person ever see the video.
- nameless912 3y agoMy back of the napkin calculation for S3's glacier tier says that would cost roughly 50 grand a year. That seems...reasonable?
- ies7 3y agoIt's very reasonable. I should wrote somehow "feel" expensive because : This data only used when we have a complaint case. Most of the times it just overwritten with new data without a single person ever see the video.