4 ms·
I tried the equation. It's 113/watts per 30 minutes of idea manifestation. My notes are at http://pastebin.com/MG0z5u6M http://pastebin.com/MG0z5u6M Correction
by swixmix 14y ago
I tried the equation. It's 113/watts per 30 minutes of idea manifestation. My notes are at http://pastebin.com/MG0z5u6M http://pastebin.com/MG0z5u6M
Corrections are welcome.
- Tyrannosaurs 14y agoI love this as ultimately it shows what nonsense the equation really is. I detest people doing "science-y, maths-y" things to try and give credibility to an idea. The idea here is fine, the equation utter bilge. For me it goes back to hearing Jeff Dachis of Razorfish doing a talk in which he mentions boolean postulates which left me in little doubt that he knew precisely as much about mathematics as you'd expect from someone with a bachelor’s degree in dance. BTW - On the last line you mention "watts per half hour". This makes no sense here - a watt is a measure of energy over time, watts per half hour would be a measure of energy over time over time, or more neatly change in power.