2 ms·
> C and C++ are still very much current. So it's interesting you say that. I worked extensively with C++ back then, and I did have occasion to do a few small
by edanm 3y ago
> C and C++ are still very much current.
So it's interesting you say that. I worked extensively with C++ back then, and I did have occasion to do a few small C++ projects about 10 years ago, and C++ seems to have changed quite a bit. It was actually really impressive.
I'm not saying it would be very hard to learn the differences, but I definitely needed a primer back then of "here's how C++ has changed", because code really did look different in some ways.
- carlmr 3y agoC++11 was quite a break, C++14 very minor, C++17 a little bit more, but not as major. C++2x is doing a lot of changes, but I haven't seen much of it in the embedded world yet. Mostly because C++17 is still considered new-ish in most safety-critical realms. But say you have some C++<11 experience I think you would need a few weeks to get up to speed max.