3 ms·

I'm kind of happy I'm not in webdev but embedded. There's not so much fads in this area. In any case, I agree, fundamentals matter much more than superficial k

• edanm 3y ago
  > I'm kind of happy I'm not in webdev but embedded. There's not so much fads in this area. How true is that about embedded though? I started out in that field for the first six years of my professional life, but it's been almost 15 years since then. I still know a lot more about it than the random dev who hasn't worked in it at all, but I kind of doubt I could be very intelligent about it without a bunch of catching up. (Though obviously I agree that there are almost certainly faster changes in web dev.)
  • carlmr 3y ago
    >but I kind of doubt I could be very intelligent about it without a bunch of catching up. I doubt you'd need to catch up because of expired knowledge. Rather things you forgot or areas that you didn't deal with yet. I think embedded can have a lot of depth if you get into certain details. There's basically no framework churn like in webdev, though. C and C++ are still very much current. Rust is becoming more of a contender, but still not common.
    • edanm 3y ago
      > C and C++ are still very much current. So it's interesting you say that. I worked extensively with C++ back then, and I did have occasion to do a few small C++ projects about 10 years ago, and C++ seems to have changed quite a bit. It was actually really impressive. I'm not saying it would be very hard to learn the differences, but I definitely needed a primer back then of "here's how C++ has changed", because code really did look different in some ways.
      • carlmr 3y ago
        C++11 was quite a break, C++14 very minor, C++17 a little bit more, but not as major. C++2x is doing a lot of changes, but I haven't seen much of it in the embedded world yet. Mostly because C++17 is still considered new-ish in most safety-critical realms. But say you have some C++<11 experience I think you would need a few weeks to get up to speed max.