I did not mention safety because the reasoning for the relevant authorities to set the policies they have was irrelevant to my point. You're arguing against a

I did not mention safety because the reasoning for the relevant authorities to set the policies they have was irrelevant to my point. You're arguing against a strawman of your own making. I addressed your point about incentives, and nothing else: The incentives here are exactly as the relevant authorities want them to be. You're free to disagree that is not how they should be, but that is an entirely separate discussion.