3 ms·
The obvious solution is to actually have librarians correctly classify the videos. DDS focuses on the nature of the work itself, not on the keywords or spam in
by waterheater 3y ago
The obvious solution is to actually have librarians correctly classify the videos. DDS focuses on the nature of the work itself, not on the keywords or spam in the content. Librarians understand how to class all kinds of works, and it should be relatively simple to build a DDS/MDS index (Melville Decimal System since it's open, see https://librarything.com/mds https://librarything.com/mds) for YouTube videos. Just like with books, disagreement on classification is inevitable and perfectly natural; there's no perfect classification scheme, though DDS/MDS does a generally good job.
- ghaff 3y agoDewey Decimal is probably not actually appropriate but it would be nice to have a good and appropriate classification scheme be used.
- wodenokoto 3y ago> The obvious solution is to actually have librarians correctly classify the videos Which videos? The 500 hours of video uploaded every minute?
- oefnak 3y agoAll videos of accounts with more than X subscribers.
- nightshift1 3y agoThere is already auto captioning done by YouTube. It would be trivial to plug an ai that generates tags and classify each videos based on the whole content. I am sure they already do that.