3 ms·
I've always found the idea that a tree that lives for 2000 years "needs" fire for reproduction on human timescales dubious. The places these trees grow natural
by bcrosby95 3y ago
I've always found the idea that a tree that lives for 2000 years "needs" fire for reproduction on human timescales dubious.
The places these trees grow naturally are not naturally fire prone. Go look at any lightning strike map.
- redeeman 3y agoforrest fires are not actually that uncommon, and contrary to what some agenda pushers say, they are not caused by climate change. a great many are by arsonists (of which the media then ignores), and the rest happens naturally. Due to poor forrest management (of preventing smaller fires), it then turns into megafires