3 ms·
I guess... I can see everyone thinks they're company is special and needs 'rock stars' and '10x's but generally 1 senior for every 5-10 juniors is fine for most
by mech422 3y ago
I guess... I can see everyone thinks they're company is special and needs 'rock stars' and '10x's but generally 1 senior for every 5-10 juniors is fine for most places.
The salary thing is annoying - for a while it seemed like most jobs were listing salaries because of CA/CO/MA requiring it. But it seems to be going back to the old "D.O.E" thing again :-/
- ElevenLathe 3y ago1 senior for 10 juniors is not a sustainable ratio unless the average person is a senior for 10x as long as they were a junior -- meaning, I guess, that in a 30 year career, you are "junior" for three years on average. I understand that this has been "sustainable" in the past because the industry was expanding, but can that continue forever?
- mech422 3y agoI always figured 3-5 years to become a 'senior' (generally 5 but I've had some really sharp juniors too)
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- ElevenLathe 3y agoWow, I've never seen someone three years off the turnip truck called senior. I would say it's usually more like 5-10, basically everyone left after those with management ambitions have flown in that direction. I'm in a relatively sleepy part of the industry though.
- sharts 3y ago> everyone thinks they're company is special and needs 'rock stars' Most of these companies are just special needs and don’t realize it.