5 ms·
Youtube is full of videos like that. A few sample excellent channels: https://www.youtube.com/@animagraffs https://www.youtube.com/@animagraffs https://www.yo
by cm2187 3y ago
Youtube is full of videos like that. A few sample excellent channels:
https://www.youtube.com/@animagraffs https://www.youtube.com/@animagraffs
https://www.youtube.com/@engineerguyvideo https://www.youtube.com/@engineerguyvideo
https://www.youtube.com/@Lesics/videos https://www.youtube.com/@Lesics/videos
The problem is more that they are drowned under the volume of content available.
- pjerem 3y agoAlso Jared Owen which does an impressive work of 3D modeling to explain how things and places work. I’m amazed by the level of documentation you have to ingest to model things in such details.
- Gerard0 3y agoWow, thanks for sharing!
- sema4hacker 3y agoIf YouTube had a Dewey decimal style clickable directory it would be a lot easier to find content.
- singleshot_ 3y agoYahoo, more or less. You’re not wrong.
- wormius 3y agorip yahoo directory and dmoz.
- wodenokoto 3y agoA librarian friend had the same complaint. The problem is that libraries Dewey decimals are managed by librarians who want to sort things correctly. YouTube would be managed by uploaders who wants their stuff to be managed _incorrectly_. YouTube recommendations and search is a super interesting problem not just because of the scale but also because uploaders are an adverse opponent, trying to keyword stuff their spam.
- waterheater 3y agoThe obvious solution is to actually have librarians correctly classify the videos. DDS focuses on the nature of the work itself, not on the keywords or spam in the content. Librarians understand how to class all kinds of works, and it should be relatively simple to build a DDS/MDS index (Melville Decimal System since it's open, see https://librarything.com/mds https://librarything.com/mds) for YouTube videos. Just like with books, disagreement on classification is inevitable and perfectly natural; there's no perfect classification scheme, though DDS/MDS does a generally good job.
- ghaff 3y agoDewey Decimal is probably not actually appropriate but it would be nice to have a good and appropriate classification scheme be used.
- wodenokoto 3y ago> The obvious solution is to actually have librarians correctly classify the videos Which videos? The 500 hours of video uploaded every minute?
- oefnak 3y agoAll videos of accounts with more than X subscribers.
- nightshift1 3y agoThere is already auto captioning done by YouTube. It would be trivial to plug an ai that generates tags and classify each videos based on the whole content. I am sure they already do that.
- ant6n 3y agoI like the game boy graphics explanations by Jesse „system of levers“: https://youtu.be/SK7XT0DWqtE https://youtu.be/SK7XT0DWqtE
- shantara 3y agoI'll recommend a couple of other channels: - Old Royal Navy instruction manuals and documentaries: https://www.youtube.com/@davidbober7035 https://www.youtube.com/@davidbober7035 My favorite is Hands To Flying Stations (1975): https://youtu.be/cALccuPShQc https://youtu.be/cALccuPShQc - Historic films and clips, mostly focused on workplace safety: https://www.youtube.com/@markdcatlin https://www.youtube.com/@markdcatlin My favorite is NASA's Toxic Propellant Hazards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ND2TeNfcmKA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ND2TeNfcmKA
- Loughla 3y agoThat toxic propellant one is fantastic.
- albrewer 3y agoI'd like to throw in a recommendation for Huygens Optics: https://www.youtube.com/@HuygensOptics https://www.youtube.com/@HuygensOptics Everything you ever wanted to know (and more) about light and lenses, explained in a way that's totally comprehensible if you learned electricity and magnetism physics in college.
- teapot7 3y agoYes - he's one of the very best! I loved his 3 part series on making a reflector telescope from a single chunk of glass.