3 ms·
As an American, this bill must die. If we want to compete, then we need to do that. Investment not protection is the path forward. Protectionist ideas dont sav
by zer00eyz 3y ago
As an American, this bill must die.
If we want to compete, then we need to do that. Investment not protection is the path forward. Protectionist ideas dont save any one, they just let shitty or inferior products flourish.
- pcarolan 3y agoHow does this theory hold up when your trade partner doesn’t give you equal access to their markets and has the potential to use this media platform to spread disinformation? I don’t think this is an innovation issue as much as a political one.
- zer00eyz 3y agoNo equal access, but Tesla, and apple remain popular in china (for those with the money to buy them) in spite of the propaganda. Our own social media platforms have been doing a perfectly good job of spreading disinformation. And now were building ML systems to accelerate someone's agenda. You beat tiktok by building what's next and watching it fade like every other platform before it.
- Nostromos 3y agoTesla and Apple aren't social media companies. They're also American companies. I'd be against the bill if American companies had as much access and freedom to operate in China as we give Chinese companies operating in the US. Since that's not gonna happen, fine with forcing bytedance to divest.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]