8 ms·
Boeing overwrote surveillance footage of door plug repair
- sydbarrett74 3y agoIf this footage was overwritten in isolation, without deleting all other footage of the same age, then that points to mens rea.
- ado__dev 3y agoAnd nothing will be done about it.
- AndrewKemendo 3y agoI’m pretty cynical but this does actually appear to be something
- red-iron-pine 3y agothere is an investigation pending. that, as of right now, means nothing. there will be a few weeks of haranguing and a few cycles in the media, then it'll die down. a few months from now this will be forgotten, and HN + every other platform will be upset about something else, be it the election, or AI, or some other corpo shannigans. then there will be a report about findings -- and we'll see what that "something" actually is. but unless they're willing to pierce the corporate veil or put people in jail, it will ultimately amount to nothing.
- dboreham 3y agoProbably hired the Epstein guards..
- dvno42 3y agoCould just be a retention thing. Unless legally mandated, why retain video footage longer than required?
- jprd 3y agoAgreed, but to have NO documentation about the work, at all?
- droopyEyelids 3y agoThat would have made a better headline
- seo-speedwagon 3y agoIt’s a neat trick, since Boeing claims they can’t find any record of the work and don’t know who did it.
- s3r3nity 3y agoThis was my initial reaction as well, but in these work environments record keeping is USUALLY extensive by design: parts, tools, even minor acts like tightening a screw or bolt is logged. The fact that they can't reproduce _ANY_ records of this work, including who would've done the work, is suspicious. Any HN'ers here have experience in these types of environments to either validate / refute?
- jononor 3y agoI do not know aerospace. But even in electronics manufacturing for general industrial use one has protocols for documenting repairs (be it Return To Manufacturer or site work), and missing would be considered a deviation. I don't think one could be compliant with a under a standard quality manager system like ISO9000 either. I would consider the lack of traceability a serious failure in itself.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- jjk166 3y agoAccording to other sources[0] Boeing says they retain surveillance footage for 30 days, and the accident was months after the work was done, so it would presumably have been overwritten before anyone knew it would matter. That being said, if you're going to use surveillance footage as a fallback to deal with missing documentation, then 30 days of retention is woefully innadequate. [0] https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/boeing-security-footage-work-jet-failed-door-plug-unavailable-ntsb https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/boeing-security-footage-...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- seo-speedwagon 3y agoSo in the last ~48 hours a major whistleblower turns up dead and evidence ends up destroyed. Hell of a company.
- JohnFen 3y agoSheesh. Here I was thinking that Boeing's failures were "just" that they prioritize profits over good engineering practices and safety. But between the whistleblower's death and now this, things are looking more nefarious than I would have suspected.
- wmf 3y agoI don't think Boeing is destroying evidence; they're just generally negligent about keeping accurate records in the first place. Boeing can't provide information that they never recorded.