3 ms·
In a previous discussion thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39692670 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39692670), there was a significant amount of
by takoid 3y ago
In a previous discussion thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39692670 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39692670), there was a significant amount of discussion regarding the belief that the push for this legislation may be influenced by the pro-Israel lobby, specifically in reaction to the uncensored flow of information via TikTok following the events of October 7th in Gaza. These discussions were quickly downvoted and flagged. However, I believe it is crucial to engage in this conversation respectfully and with a genuine intent for understanding. The potential influence of such lobbying efforts, if substantiated, carries profound implications that merit thoughtful discussion, irrespective of one's personal stance on Israel, Gaza, or the broader political dynamics. If you share these concerns, I encourage you to reply with any evidence supporting your viewpoint, so we can engage in a constructive and good-faith discussion about this issue.
- jrsj 3y agoIf this is true, AIPAC is a greater foreign threat than TikTok. Maybe we should ban AIPAC instead.
- nebula8804 3y agoHow do you ban AIPAC when they are basically malware that is running at all layers of the stack from OS to Firmware to CPU Microcode? Good luck with that!