3 ms·

I understand that this is a great leap in AI and it sounds amazing, looks amazing, almost unbeliable. I wonder if it is needed, though. I can't find a good rea

by 101008 3y ago

I understand that this is a great leap in AI and it sounds amazing, looks amazing, almost unbeliable. I wonder if it is needed, though. I can't find a good reason for computers playing videogames. I read another comment saying that they could be your buddies in an adventure game... what's the point? The fun is to play with other people. We already are able to play with bots (different algorithms rule them), so I can't see why someone would prefer this over them. About traslating this from a virtual world to the real world... I can't imagine who would think it's a good idea to give this type of freedom to machines in a physical world, were consequences are way riskier than something digital (and yes, digitally they could empty your bank account, physically they could kill someone. One is much worser than the other).

kapperchino 3y ago
It’s to replace qa testers for video games
- bamboozled 3y ago
  They’re expensive and ruin our bottom lines.
chankstein38 3y ago
>About traslating this from a virtual world to the real world... I can't imagine who would think it's a good idea to give this type of freedom to machines in a physical world, were consequences are way riskier than something digital (and yes, digitally they could empty your bank account, physically they could kill someone. One is much worser than the other). Right now there are robots in many factories around the world, some are discrete machines that aren't tethered down and have movement capabilities. You don't think that there are factory managers/etc out there drooling about the idea of getting those or something similar to be able to do general factory tasks? Imagine your employee who tapes up boxes before shipment quits one day out of the blue. "Hey, package carrying bot 9000, can you go tape those boxes? I'll have someone show you what to do" Not necessarily a good idea still but just because we don't want it doesn't mean there aren't a million beneficial uses of this kind of generalizing.
WFHRenaissance 3y ago
My thinking is that it enables a "more full" virtual world.

by 101008 3y ago

kapperchino 3y ago

It’s to replace qa testers for video games

bamboozled 3y ago
They’re expensive and ruin our bottom lines.

chankstein38 3y ago

>About traslating this from a virtual world to the real world... I can't imagine who would think it's a good idea to give this type of freedom to machines in a physical world, were consequences are way riskier than something digital (and yes, digitally they could empty your bank account, physically they could kill someone. One is much worser than the other). Right now there are robots in many factories around the world, some are discrete machines that aren't tethered down and have movement capabilities. You don't think that there are factory managers/etc out there drooling about the idea of getting those or something similar to be able to do general factory tasks? Imagine your employee who tapes up boxes before shipment quits one day out of the blue. "Hey, package carrying bot 9000, can you go tape those boxes? I'll have someone show you what to do" Not necessarily a good idea still but just because we don't want it doesn't mean there aren't a million beneficial uses of this kind of generalizing.

WFHRenaissance 3y ago

My thinking is that it enables a "more full" virtual world.