In the 'status update' post that's linked from the article, they acknowledge the old licensing situation won't fly and say they're trying to figure out a way fo

In the 'status update' post that's linked from the article, they acknowledge the old licensing situation won't fly and say they're trying to figure out a way forwards that keeps as much as possible open source without becoming a tasty snack for AWS. So yes, the license you read is a reason why I wouldn't touch it either, but hopefully a bit further down the line the licensing situation will change substantially and we can both update our opinions then.