3 ms·
As long as it's properly tested in terms of out-of-training testing data with sufficient statistics, I'd welcome AI decision making over human any day. When you
by tensor 3y ago
As long as it's properly tested in terms of out-of-training testing data with sufficient statistics, I'd welcome AI decision making over human any day. When you have humans in charge you know for sure that you have a substantially biased decision maker with completely unknown error levels.
- verisimi 3y agoYou prefer your decision making authority to be corporate one?
- tensor 3y agoCritical decision making systems are present across industry and also government today. I'm not interested in discussing the balance of industry vs government control of our lives. Suffice to say, if a decision is being made that affects me I'd like it to be as accurate and bias free as possible, regardless of the organization making it.
- verisimi 3y agoThink about what you are saying here: > I'm not interested in discussing the balance of industry vs government control of our lives. With you, some level of corporate or government control is inevitable - it is assumed in your answer. This control is (immorally) inflicted on everyone. I want no extra governmental or corporate strictures. Where's my option? There is none. That's democracy! With laws served up to you by unrelated bureaucrats.
- verisimi 3y ago* Unelected, not unrelated!
- CamperBob2 3y agoWhat choice is there?
- verisimi 3y agoI'm saying, if you start inviting greater governmental control into your life, you don't need to be a genius to work out what happens - you will be governed more and you will lose personal freedom.