4 ms·
The artistic license thing in itself I think is fine if only it didn't go just one direction. And you may very well be right that the examples it may have seen
by vidarh 3y ago
The artistic license thing in itself I think is fine if only it didn't go just one direction. And you may very well be right that the examples it may have seen of coloring books may well be a very peculiar subset.
- latexr 3y ago“Artistic license” assumes agency, that there is some artist who understands the facts of a situation and deliberately changes them in the work. It does not apply to a machine doing a poor job because it lacks context in its training data. Just like medieval art, which was inaccurate¹ due to ignorance, not because the person doing the drawing decided to add some flare. ¹ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnB2Uj7gWSE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnB2Uj7gWSE
- throwup238 3y ago> Just like medieval art, which was inaccurate¹ due to ignorance, not because the person doing the drawing decided to add some flare. There's a site showing how Europeans drew elephants from popular descriptions once they disappeared from the continent: https://www.uliwestphal.de/elephas-anthropogenus/index.html https://www.uliwestphal.de/elephas-anthropogenus/index.html