6 ms·
Those use different (less efficient, older, and perhaps deprecated-in-the-future) APIs. I encourage you to try to build a working copy of the official WireGuar
by sneak 3y ago
Those use different (less efficient, older, and perhaps deprecated-in-the-future) APIs.
I encourage you to try to build a working copy of the official WireGuard macOS app from source without an ADP membership. You can't.
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-apple/about/ https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-apple/about/
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-apple/tree/Sources/WireGuardApp/Config/Developer.xcconfig.template https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-apple/tree/Sources/WireGuard...
- traceroute66 3y ago> Those use different (less efficient, older, and perhaps deprecated-in-the-future) APIs. Your original statement is still bullshit. You said "Apple simply will not provide the required VPN entitlements for web/self distributed apps". I've clearly demonstrated that statement is just plain wrong. MullvadVPN and ProtonVPN are not distributed via the AppStore and they work and are not blocked by MacOS.
- bananapub 3y ago> Those use different (less efficient, older, and perhaps deprecated-in-the-future) APIs. then correct your initial post, which says something entirely different: > Fun fact: the WireGuard macOS client application cannot work on macOS unless it's distributed via the App Store - Apple simply will not provide the required VPN entitlements for web/self distributed apps. You can use the commandline wg tools (which use a different OS API) but not the GUI ones. it really is increasingly annoying that people just post nonsense on HN to back up their dumb prejudices.
- SadCordDrone 3y agoHey Tim, come with your real ID.