2 ms·
that's interested because you created a point I didn't make, in order to discredit the point I did make I won't call it a strawman argument since the grandpare
by yieldcrv 3y ago
that's interested because you created a point I didn't make, in order to discredit the point I did make
I won't call it a strawman argument since the grandparent post did say "inability to functionally govern and reach bi-partisan support for a lot of meaningful issues renders us helpless to improve bad systems", I was not making a point about bills passing
my only, isolated point, is that it is valid to be frustrated by the ways in which the parties are the same.
you decided to talk about one way you believe they are different. its fine if that was a misunderstanding of my point, but if you're not aware of any unproductive way the parties are the same, then this discussion isn't for you.
- ajross 3y ago> my only, isolated point, is that it is valid to be frustrated by the ways in which the parties are the same. You made that "isolated" point in a subthread about gridlock and the inability to pass meaningful legislation. And in that particular argument to which you replied, you were wrong: the parties are not "the same".