3 ms·
The Morris worm affected around 2000 VAX machines a couple of years previously, and was the first ever such incident on that scale. In other words, almost nobod
by akoboldfrying 3y ago
The Morris worm affected around 2000 VAX machines a couple of years previously, and was the first ever such incident on that scale. In other words, almost nobody in 1990 had been affected by a computer security incident. It didn't make sense in 1990 to prioritise this security threat over efficiency concerns.
Insisting on memory safety back then would be like insisting on code being accompanied by checkable formal proofs of correctness now: It's a technique that can be applied right now and that does improve safety, but it comes at such a cost that the tradeoff only makes sense for a handful of niche applications (aerospace, automotive, medical devices).
- pjmlp 3y agoYeah, that is why we didn't had to buy anti-virus software, duh.
- akoboldfrying 3y agoViruses in 1990 propagated by people running .EXE files they copied from somewhere, or booting floppy disks they found somewhere. Tell me how bounds checks on array accesses would have prevented that.
- pjmlp 3y agohttps://securelist.com/malware-evolution-may-roundup/100376/ https://securelist.com/malware-evolution-may-roundup/100376/
- akoboldfrying 3y ago> 01 JUN 2004 Got anything relevant?