3 ms·
> …that doesn't rule out that the poorest in the country (minorities and whites) are not the most exposed. Setting aside race, to me it seems like "economicall
by CharlesW 3y ago
> …that doesn't rule out that the poorest in the country (minorities and whites) are not the most exposed.
Setting aside race, to me it seems like "economically disadvantaged populations share a disproportionate burden of traffic-related air pollution exposure" makes this pretty clear. <shrug>
- mattgrice 3y agoIt's not 1950, everyone on this site has a 1+ GFLOP machine so there's no need to squash a bunch of independent variables down to one dimension or as you call it "set aside race." Unless you're not a hacker, that is. Even into the 1960s wealthy black people were prevented from buying and living in the 'good' parts of even northern US cities.
- porkbeer 3y agoCare to enlighten us as to the second paragraph? I only found some misc stuff, nothing appearing to be systemic or enshrined in law. In fact I see laws against such things being enforced more than lamented in searches.