This is exactly my experience. Furthermore, I've become acutely aware that spending time prompting either a) prevents me from going down rabbit holes, all but d

This is exactly my experience. Furthermore, I've become acutely aware that spending time prompting either a) prevents me from going down rabbit holes, all but denying me the kind of learning that can only really happen during those kinds of sessions, and b) prevents me from "getting my reps in" on stuff that I already know. It stands to reason that my ability to coax actually useful information out of LLMs will atrophy with time. I'm quite wary of the long-term implications and downstream effects of that occurring at scale. AI is typically presented as "the human's hands are still on the wheel," but in reality I think we're handing the wheel over to the AI -- after all, what else would the endgame be? By definition, the more it can do without requiring human intervention, the "better" it is. Even if replacing people isn't the intention, I fail to see how any other effect could usurp that. Assuming AI keeps developing as it has been, where will we be in 20 years? 50? Will anyone actually have the knowledge to evaluate the code it produces? Will it even matter? Perhaps it's because Dune is in the air, but I'm really feeling the whole "in a time of increased technology, human capabilities matter more than ever" thing it portrays.