3 ms·
As a developer who is good at object oriented design, architecture, and sucks at leetcode stuff, I have been able to use it to make myself probably twice as pro
by narrator 3y ago
As a developer who is good at object oriented design, architecture, and sucks at leetcode stuff, I have been able to use it to make myself probably twice as productive as I otherwise would be. I just have a conversation with GPT-4 when it doesn't do what I want. "Could you make that object oriented?" "Could you do that for this API instead, here let me paste the docs in for you."
I think people want it to completely replace developers so they can treat programming as a magic box, but it will probably mostly help big picture architecture devs compete with people who are really good at Leetcode type algorithm stuff.
- notpachet 3y ago> it will probably mostly help big picture architecture devs compete with people who are really good at Leetcode type algorithm stuff. The competition should be happening in the other direction.
- ecoquant 3y agoTotally agree. I am not a professional developer. I find programming to be quite dull and uninteresting. I am going to work on something after this pot of coffee brews that I simply could not produce without chatGPT4. The ideas will be mine but the most of the code will be from chatGPT. What is obvious is different skill sets are helped more than others with the addition of these tools. I would even say it is all there in the language we use. If we are passing out "artificial intelligence" to people, the people who already have quite a bit of intelligence will be helped far less than those lacking in intelligence. Then combine that with the asymmetry of domains this artificial intelligence will help in. It should be no surprise we see hugely varied opinions on its usefulness.