3 ms·
Sure, and if a developer finds a way to bypass that security restriction, Apple no longer has the ability to ban that developer. > The DMA is not requiring thi
by burnerthrow008 3y ago
Sure, and if a developer finds a way to bypass that security restriction, Apple no longer has the ability to ban that developer.
> The DMA is not requiring this to be changed.
Not according to the DMA maximalists on this thread, who believe that you should be able to install any software that does anything it wants.
- jamil7 3y agoThey can revoke that developers' certificates and patch whatever vulnerability allowed a developer to bypass that restriction.
- burnerthrow008 3y ago> They can revoke that developers' certificates Well, no, they can’t. That’s the whole point of the DMA. > and patch whatever vulnerability allowed a developer to bypass that restriction. Sure, close the door after the cow has left barn. In the rest of the civilized world, developers will not do something so blatant in the first place because they know it will result in an account ban.
- jamil7 3y ago> Well, no, they can’t. That’s the whole point of the DMA. Yes, they can. And no that’s not the whole point of the DMA. You still need to have a valid Apple developer account and certificates managed through Apple.
- ambichook 3y agoi mean... the app is still going to have to ask the OS for permission to use those features, which will then pass the question on to the user like it always has won't it?