3 ms·
Claude Opus is working for me. It's not perfect but it definitely handles busy work well enough that it's a net positive. Like I add some new fields to a table
by brigadier132 3y ago
Claude Opus is working for me. It's not perfect but it definitely handles busy work well enough that it's a net positive. Like I add some new fields to a table and ask it to update all the files that depend on the field and it works after 1 or 2 tries. There is a time saving benefit but there is also an avoiding mental fatigue benefit for busywork.
- malux85 3y agoThis is what I use it for too -- Write me the molecular simulation boilerplate because these crappy tools all have their own esoteric DSLs, then I tweak the parameters to my use case, avoiding the busywork - e.g. "Write me a simulation for methane burning in air" Gives me a boilerplate, I modify the initial conditions (concentrations, temperatures, etc) and then deploy. Have the LLM do the busy-work, so I dont have to spend ages reading docs or finding examples just to get started. Now deploy to a stable environment. Thats what I'm trying to help with by building https://atomictessellator.com https://atomictessellator.com
- HakuG 3y agoWhat are you using on top of Claude Opus that helps it access your file system?
- brigadier132 3y agocmd c cmd v, definitely not ideal