> (And to be clear, we were never debating whether action should be pursued. Just whether it could be, or whether an attorney should refuse to do so.) No, we w

> (And to be clear, we were never debating whether action should be pursued. Just whether it could be, or whether an attorney should refuse to do so.) No, we were, because that was my argument. This is putting words in my mouth and moving the goalposts. I never said my basis for "should", you just chose it to read as "should on legal grounds" whereas my statement was "should if all things were fair".