2 ms·
That's farcical. He was banned for having strong opinions about many things, meaning that nearly everybody would disagree with him about at least something, if
by lupusreal 3y ago
That's farcical. He was banned for having strong opinions about many things, meaning that nearly everybody would disagree with him about at least something, if not everything. The result was that nobody liked him so a pretext for banning him was devised. Hell, I disagree with him on many if not most things, but I don't think he should be banned for it.
Drew, if you're in this thread: I've argued with you several times before but the way you get 'canceled' for having strong convictions is an injustice. Stay true to you.