Yeah. What I like about the 100% memory safe goal is that it’s a falsifiable goal. Even the Rust style goal of “you’re memory safe if you do 100% rust and nev

Yeah. What I like about the 100% memory safe goal is that it’s a falsifiable goal. Even the Rust style goal of “you’re memory safe if you do 100% rust and never use unsafe” has the nice property of being falsifiable. 98% memory safe is not a falsifiable goal. It gives the C++ designers the option of never actually fixing the problem while claiming they had by picking a sloppy way of measuring the “%”.