https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39681537 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39681537 seemed to refer to evidence. Thanks for the video though. It's over

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39681537 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39681537 seemed to refer to evidence. Thanks for the video though. It's over an hour, but I'll watch it. Edit: So you're asserting that there's zero evidence by taking his own defence lawyers at their word? Saying their client is innocent is literally their jobs. And they do acknowledge evidence (so not nothing) but they (his lawyers) are unconvinced. This defence sounds more baseless than the Free Kevin campaign, where once all the dust settled and he could write a book about it, yeah he did do most of that shit.