4 ms·

I'm not sure what your point is. Is your point that we shouldn't worry about rendering pages with JS because someday in the future google will be able to index

by jshen 18y ago

I'm not sure what your point is. Is your point that we shouldn't worry about rendering pages with JS because someday in the future google will be able to index it equally well? If so your livelyhood clearly doesn't depend on SEO. I'm not gambling mine on what is currently vaporware. Btw, people made this exact point about flash a few years ago and your pages will not rank nearly as well if you do them in flash.

jerf 18y ago
I think my point was pretty adequately captured by "So that's why Google is developing a speedy JS interpreter", although I have done you the favor of re-emphasizing the subject for you. I don't care about SEO. I think Google wants to see into those sites, and I don't think they much care about SEO either.
- jshen 18y ago
  I still don't see what your point is. Something like, "google doesn't care about SEO therefore site s that do should use javascript frameworks instead of static html" or something?
  - jerf 18y ago
    My point is not about you at all. If you can't see the value for Google of seeing through Javascript, that's your problem, not mine or Google's.
    - jshen 18y ago
      hehe, well when you reply to my comment I assume that it is about my comment. This is the whole point of threaded comments