3 ms·
> we began enforcing reduced sulfur emissions from diesel motors in international waters. The expectation was that would help with climate change, how couldn't
by MagnumOpus 3y ago
> we began enforcing reduced sulfur emissions from diesel motors in international waters. The expectation was that would help with climate change, how couldn't it
Nice story, but the drive to reduce SOx and other particulate emissions is not because of climate chance but because of localized health concerns: because of the respiratory impact of SOx and soot to the lungs of people on coastlines and in port cities.
By the way, Dieselgate is a similar story - the illegally-increased SOx, NOx and particulate emissions of those diesel engines were created in order to decrease fuel consumption and thus climate change impact. Cracking down on Dieselgate helped people living near the car exhausts but hurt the climate as a secondary effect...
- _heimdall 3y agoEverything I have seen related to sulfur emmisions reduction of diesel engines used in international waters referenced the environmental impacts not respiratory impact. There aren't many humans out in the middle of the ocean, the problem being solved was the massive amounts of diesel emissions being pumped into the atmosphere from the international shipping industry. Dieselgate was a very different problem to solve. VW was caught lying on emissions tests to avoid regulations meant to reduce emissions in populated areas like large cities.