3 ms·
In this case, the argument is indeed self evidently right. Trying to equate the two things after being able to observe both in the real world is like seriously
by southernplaces7 3y ago
In this case, the argument is indeed self evidently right. Trying to equate the two things after being able to observe both in the real world is like seriously claiming that a stove fire and a nuclear blast are pretty much the same thing because they both produce light and heat. Why would anyone bother convincing anyone out of such an obviously absurd claim in a practical context?
- Turing_Machine 3y ago> In this case, the argument is indeed self evidently right. No, it absolutely is not. > obviously absurd claim You are obviously and absurdly wrong. It's clear that nothing productive is going to come of this conversation.