> Not that I don't believe what you're saying, but how is this a thing they could possibly expect to hold up as a trademark infringement? The worst part is tha

> Not that I don't believe what you're saying, but how is this a thing they could possibly expect to hold up as a trademark infringement? The worst part is that it doesn't even matter if they have a case or not. The mere threat of "Look at how much it'll cost you even if you're right" can be enough for people to pull back. Recent relevant case is the Sony vs Bleem!, where Bleem! "won" but because of costs, Bleem! had to shut down anyway. So even if Sony lost the court case, they won because they shut down the group.