3 ms·
It doesn't even have to be Boeing. It's possible that a government agency could do it as well. For example, suppose Boeing is seen by the government as a nation
by aurareturn 3y ago
It doesn't even have to be Boeing. It's possible that a government agency could do it as well. For example, suppose Boeing is seen by the government as a national entity, it's possible for a government agency such as CIA to do the assignation if they think he puts the country in an unfavorable position.
But I think it's more likely that a shareholder/high stakes person connected to Boeing might want to do it.
There is no way Boeing, the company, would do it in my opinion. That would be nuts.
- RachelF 3y agoDon't forget the US government was spying on the French to get Airbus commercial contract details for Boeing.
- Brian_K_White 3y agoDoesn't even have to be someone important or with a lot of money on the line, just anyone with a lot on the line for them, and that doesn't require anything but a feeling. A janitor who thinks they will lose their job which might be no money but critical (or feel critical) to them because of retirement or health care, maybe for a relative etc, or any rando that some nobody middle manager lizard pressured or even merely manipulated by just talking.
- fifteen1506 3y agoThere is no way Boeing, the company, would disparage the long-earned reputation in order to save some money and with the risk of people dying. -- would have said someone a few years ago
- ilovetux 3y ago> There is no way Boeing, the company, would do it in my opinion. That would be nuts. What does it mean for Boeing, the company, to have done it or not? Boeing is a large corporation comprised of individuals and assets. If foul play was involved, how many of these individuals would it take to be considered that Boeing carried out the murder? Would they need to have used company assets? Would it need to have come down the chain of command?