5 ms·
No I was not doing that. I was mostly being sarcastic. I will however argue that with no oversight at all, things would be much worse. I do think your argumen
by rstat1 3y ago
No I was not doing that. I was mostly being sarcastic.
I will however argue that with no oversight at all, things would be much worse.
I do think your arguments give people too much credit though. If the choice was a cheaper flight but on a plane with a dubious safety record vs a more expensive flight on a plane with a good safety record I'd wager most would take option 1
- _heimdall 3y agoI didn't catch your sarcasm there, sorry about that. > I'd wager most would take option 1 If those people where aware of the safety concerns and made the choice knowingly, what's the problem? We don't need to regulate people from informed consent, do we?
- rstat1 3y ago> I didn't catch your sarcasm there, sorry about that. No worries. It is text after all. >If those people where aware of the safety concerns and made the choice knowingly, what's the problem? We don't need to regulate people from informed consent, do we? I would say no, but in the same vane argue that such things shouldn't be a choice you have to make, that all planes should be some base level of safe. And since no company (at least in the US) is going to do that willingly because that hurts profits someone with teeth needs to exist to make them.