2 ms·
> those advancement have made their way into practical languages I agree with this for the most part, though I've yet to see a non-lisp language support macros
by wtetzner 3y ago
> those advancement have made their way into practical languages
I agree with this for the most part, though I've yet to see a non-lisp language support macros as nicely as Scheme's syntax-case.
Also, while Lisp's features have made their way into modern languages, there are very few that contain all of them at the same time.
> those advancement have made their way into practical languages
I disagree with this.
- kazinator 3y agoA language that contains all Lisp features becomes identifiable as a member of the Lisp family, and is then removed from the discussion of languages that don't have all Lisp features.