4 ms·

It's a search engine... What about it makes it specific to IP piracy? I actually understand your point well but I think it's even more important not to group i

• neilv 3y ago
  Good point. In much the same way that you're trying to avoid emulators being considered only for piracy, I'm trying to avoid that with ebooks. What I was commenting upon is that I think this particular thing will actually appear to many people to be for piracy of ebooks, and I don't want "ebook" to become synonymous with "pirated book" in the mind of the public (and especially not in the minds of publishers and authors who I want to encourage and support making non-DRM ebooks). As a compromise, I'd like people whose efforts are intended for pirating books to distinguish that from legitimate ebooks, not call it simply "ebooks". Maybe then it'll be easier for our respective "freedom and access" goals to coexist. (FWIW, I'm actually sympathetic to some of the uses of pirated books, such as sharing the wealth of the world's information with people who just can't afford it, or who have it officially denied to them. I'm less sympathetic to people who could pay for something but choose to take it instead, but I'm not trying to combat that here. I just want to mitigate some of the bad effects of piracy, such as legitimate buyers only being able to get DRM'd books, and only for consumer-hostile locked-down devices. Please don't inadvertently sabotage that orthogonal effort by appropriating language.)