3 ms·

The article even links to real-world performance measurements that are completely separate from the benchmark. I have no idea what the purpose of the OP's comme

The article even links to real-world performance measurements that are completely separate from the benchmark. I have no idea what the purpose of the OP's comment was. I guess they just wanted to blurt out the first cynical thing that came to mind. Awesome contribution.

dylan604 3y ago
I love the fact that an honest question is met with such hostility. I knew there was a quote, but was unable to think of it well enough for a proper search. It is easier to find an answer from other people with just a shard of detail that search engine will not find as there's no SEO for the broken fragment. I'm so happy to see this place is alive and well with the attitude to support a curious mind. What a tosser
- mos_basik 3y ago
  I've probably spent too much time on the internet, then, because I definitely wouldn't have interpreted your original post as an honest question without having seen the clarification in your followup comment. Probably a defense mechanism built from past pain caused by my assuming good faith and then being ridiculed from the non-honest-question-asker. But with that nastiness out of the way - I looked back at your original question and thought "seems like the kind of query Kagi would eat for breakfast". Here's what it responded to your question: https://kagi.com/search?q=What%27s+the+quote+about+optimizing+for+the+metric+makes+the+metric+irrelevant%3F&r=us&sh=wTkVF5oswsMNDXZxk50Ahg https://kagi.com/search?q=What%27s+the+quote+about+optimizin... Specifically, the "what" at the start and the "?" at the end triggered the LLM-powered quick answer at the top (and it passes the smell test for correctness). To Google's credit, it also returns reasonable results for this question.
- coldpie 3y ago
  So, why are you bringing up the quote in this context, then?
  - dylan604 3y ago
    Because it's directly what spurred the thought? What, I'm supposed to post it randomly?

dylan604 3y ago

I love the fact that an honest question is met with such hostility. I knew there was a quote, but was unable to think of it well enough for a proper search. It is easier to find an answer from other people with just a shard of detail that search engine will not find as there's no SEO for the broken fragment. I'm so happy to see this place is alive and well with the attitude to support a curious mind. What a tosser

mos_basik 3y ago
I've probably spent too much time on the internet, then, because I definitely wouldn't have interpreted your original post as an honest question without having seen the clarification in your followup comment. Probably a defense mechanism built from past pain caused by my assuming good faith and then being ridiculed from the non-honest-question-asker. But with that nastiness out of the way - I looked back at your original question and thought "seems like the kind of query Kagi would eat for breakfast". Here's what it responded to your question: https://kagi.com/search?q=What%27s+the+quote+about+optimizing+for+the+metric+makes+the+metric+irrelevant%3F&r=us&sh=wTkVF5oswsMNDXZxk50Ahg https://kagi.com/search?q=What%27s+the+quote+about+optimizin... Specifically, the "what" at the start and the "?" at the end triggered the LLM-powered quick answer at the top (and it passes the smell test for correctness). To Google's credit, it also returns reasonable results for this question.
coldpie 3y ago
So, why are you bringing up the quote in this context, then?
- dylan604 3y ago
  Because it's directly what spurred the thought? What, I'm supposed to post it randomly?