3 ms·
There is no situation where cameras are acceptable in another person's living space, so whether this only affects honest hosts is irrelevant; as long as it redu
by Salgat 3y ago
There is no situation where cameras are acceptable in another person's living space, so whether this only affects honest hosts is irrelevant; as long as it reduces usage, it is a good thing. Imagine hotels arguing for allowing cameras in their suites because they are "honest".
- lazyasciiart 3y agoI believe the argument is that dishonest hotels will simply say "Yep, we got rid of cameras too!" without actually doing so.
- Salgat 3y agoYou could never trust a host to respond honestly about that anyways, so it's a moot point. AirBNB up until recently never acted on indoor cameras, and didn't care if a user reported it even if they felt the host hid/misled that information.
- lotsofpulp 3y agoI have never heard of hotels putting cameras inside rooms.
- rolph 3y agoimagine a hotel charging you because when you obstruct the camera with some object, your video [profile data] couldnt be provided to a data broker