3 ms·
I'll take the 16" MBP, thanks. I can get more memory, in my case 36GB vs. 24GB, I get more cores, and most importantly, I get more ports. Am I paying half as mu
by taylodl 3y ago
I'll take the 16" MBP, thanks. I can get more memory, in my case 36GB vs. 24GB, I get more cores, and most importantly, I get more ports. Am I paying half as much again? Yes. But I'm getting a machine I can realistically use for at least twice as long, so it's a better value in the long run and delivers more capability over its lifetime. Obviously, YMMV.
- Spartan-S63 3y agoI realized recently that my 16" M1 Max MBP is entering its third year of service for me. It still feels fast and I have plenty of disk space. I do wish I had more memory, but I have plenty for what I do now—though I'd want more if I did more with on-device LLMs. I was tempted by the M3 Max, but I'll wait for M4 Max since my M1 Max is barely breaking a sweat. For me, The Mx Pro/Max is a must-have since I tend to be a heavier user. For a casual user, though, I think the base Mx Air is a fine machine. In fact, I have a coworker doing SWE work on an M2 Air.
- TMWNN 3y ago>I'll take the 16" MBP, thanks. I can get more memory, in my case 36GB vs. 24GB My current and previous MacBooks have had 16GB and I've been fine with it, but given local LLMs I think I'm going to have to go to whatever will be the maximum RAM available for the next model. Similarly, I am for the first time going to care about how much RAM is in my next iPhone. My iPhone 13's 4GB is suddenly inadequate.
- taylodl 3y ago> My current and previous MacBooks have had 16GB and I've been fine with it I have too, but my MBP is from 2012! It's not unrealistic for me to consider a machine that's going to get me to 2034.
- TMWNN 3y agoI would still be using my 2012 if the hinge hadn't become so loose as to not let the screen stand up!