4 ms·

Making small changes to policy like this will continue to have no effect on the negative externalities of AirBNB rentals. Will this improve guest privacy? No,

Making small changes to policy like this will continue to have no effect on the negative externalities of AirBNB rentals. Will this improve guest privacy? No, hidden cameras are too difficult to detect and too easy to install. Will this prevent AirBNBs becoming party houses/apartments in residential areas? No, obviously not, since that's apparently already banned. Will this collect commercial taxes from investment property owners illegally renting out AirBNBs in residential zones? Of course not. Et cetera.

ActualHacker 3y ago
But they get to remind everyone that they're the "good guys", and they're "trying"
CapcomGo 3y ago
My guess is it will stop property owners from using cameras openly indoors as they have been allowed to before.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
samtho 3y ago
This does give AirBnB a reason enshrined in policy to take consistent action against misbehaving hosts, something that was lacking previously. Also, I am not sure why you are conflating AirBnB’s authority with a local government - or course AirBnB won’t address the issues you cite in your last paragraphs as that is not their job and to think it should be is totally ridiculous. We have local and state governance to pass laws regulating behavior that is not good for society at large. AirBnB’s job is to generate value for shareholders all while operating within those bounds.
- digging 3y ago
  Why wouldn't it be AirBNB's responsibility to prevent hosts from operating illegally?
scarface_74 3y ago
You know what you could do? 1. Not allow Airbnbs in residential areas 2. Force each Airbnb host to list the address You know, like hotels
zeroonetwothree 3y ago
Hidden cameras aren’t as useful if the host can’t take any obvious action from it. So it does have an effect
kube-system 3y ago
There are properties with openly visible cameras in the interior, which are typically pointed at reasonable locations to watch (like the front door), but being inside, they could potentially be listening to conversations that they don't really need to be. Those cameras should really be on the exterior of the property. This fixes that.

ActualHacker 3y ago

But they get to remind everyone that they're the "good guys", and they're "trying"

CapcomGo 3y ago

My guess is it will stop property owners from using cameras openly indoors as they have been allowed to before.

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

samtho 3y ago

This does give AirBnB a reason enshrined in policy to take consistent action against misbehaving hosts, something that was lacking previously. Also, I am not sure why you are conflating AirBnB’s authority with a local government - or course AirBnB won’t address the issues you cite in your last paragraphs as that is not their job and to think it should be is totally ridiculous. We have local and state governance to pass laws regulating behavior that is not good for society at large. AirBnB’s job is to generate value for shareholders all while operating within those bounds.

digging 3y ago
Why wouldn't it be AirBNB's responsibility to prevent hosts from operating illegally?

scarface_74 3y ago

You know what you could do? 1. Not allow Airbnbs in residential areas 2. Force each Airbnb host to list the address You know, like hotels

zeroonetwothree 3y ago

Hidden cameras aren’t as useful if the host can’t take any obvious action from it. So it does have an effect

kube-system 3y ago

There are properties with openly visible cameras in the interior, which are typically pointed at reasonable locations to watch (like the front door), but being inside, they could potentially be listening to conversations that they don't really need to be. Those cameras should really be on the exterior of the property. This fixes that.