3 ms·
I agree, if it's an instant decision to avoid a knife in the ribs then nobody could think ill of someone for instinctively protecting their life. It's more thi
by JonnieCache 14y ago
I agree, if it's an instant decision to avoid a knife in the ribs then nobody could think ill of someone for instinctively protecting their life.
It's more things like this I'm talking about:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpjFsmTDWuQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpjFsmTDWuQ
It's obviously an extreme example but it illustrates the point, as does that business on the white house lawn.
(Also I'd contend that in practice most knife-wielding assailants, far from being even moderately trained, are probably clueless and scared.)
- harshreality 14y agoStill, you don't want to bet your life that the assailant doesn't know how to wield a knife. I don't agree with shooting anyone who is brandishing a knife, but trying to disarm them is a horrible idea as well. As others have mentioned, using beanbag guns or a taser or tear gas or rubber bullets or just about any less-lethal option (with other officers ready to shoot if the assailant charges) is the best solution.