There has been plenty of coverage of bogus or low-quality articles in journals that cater to publishing them. See "Rat Dck" [https://gizmodo.com/rat-dck-among-g

There has been plenty of coverage of bogus or low-quality articles in journals that cater to publishing them. See "Rat Dck" [https://gizmodo.com/rat-dck-among-gibberish-ai-images-published-in-science-1851260727 https://gizmodo.com/rat-dck-among-gibberish-ai-images-publis...] for an example of blatant b.s. Are these publishers part of the set that is being worried over? Seems OK to let them be forgotten.